In a prior life, I worked as an IT consultant helping to implement large information systems.  My first assignment was assisting the State of Nevada with installing workers compensation processing software.  That required me to spend a fair amount of time in Carson City, the smallest of the fifty state capitals.  While staying at the Best Western represented an upgrade on our overnight accommodations, a real treat was bunking up in nearby Reno which was far more honky-tonk than casino glitz.

When staying in “America’s Biggest Little City,” I preferred kicking my feet up at Circus Circus, for the hotel’s Channel 1 claimed that its 13″ buffet plate Continue reading »



After listening to last night’s stump speeches from the leaders of both political parties, I humbly call on the services of the one American who perhaps could solve our nation’s current fiscal crisis judiciously and expeditiously.  Although passing in 1991, Theodor Geisel, known to us all as the lovable “Dr. Seuss,” could still instruct high ranking officials of the U.S. government on the benefits of compromise and the consequences of unmitigated stubbornness.  Some may think that I have taken too flippant of a tone to such a complex problem that has the potential to cause substantial collateral damage to both the domestic and global economy.  I counter by arguing that I am dead serious in proposing this analogy as any seven year old who recently read such classics as “The Zax” or “The Sneetches” would question how people would rather dig both heels in the ground and balk at fixing the crisis than responsibly performing their civic duty given to them by their parents at the ballot box.

I suppose that referencing Dr. Seuss breaks down at one level, for the famous children’s author always takes the dilemma of each story beyond the point of no return such that the misery that arises from implacable decision making teaches a moral far more valuable than all that had been lost.  Unfortunately, we do not live in a world with star belly sneetches, zax, or even cats in hats.  Instead, the damage done by the inaction during the days prior to next Tuesday’s deadline would dwarf the lesson learned in a post August 2 state of default and/or AA+ credit.

Alas, I remain optimistic that the parties will consummate a deal that appropriately addresses the issues at hand and with time to spare.  The market agrees with me, for while the S&P 500 continues to stall its upward march when reaching the mid-1340’s to leave behind a tall pile of wood to chop acting as significant technical resistance, the blue chip index would have already dropped precipitously if investors truly believed in a likely credit event.  That being said, upon an announcement of an agreement, I still expect stocks to gap higher aggressively.

I indicated in yesterday’s commentary that game theory suggests President Obama should bundle the raising of the debt ceiling with shrinking the budget to win the day as his alliance with the Senate, which includes the backing of some moderate Republicans, tips the scales just enough to force the House Republicans to defect from their stance.  His address to the nation from the White House last night did just that to maintain the slight advantage he owns.  Perhaps he received a bit of an unintended gift from Speaker Boehner and his faction by not adequately apprising the ratings agencies of their plan to solve the crisis as CNN’s Erin Burnett reported that S&P has hinted it likely would still downgrade U.S. sovereign debt upon enactment of this option.

The conservative blogs immediately chewed on Ms. Burnett’s reporting as pure liberal media fodder, yet I maintain these firms have remained fully transparent throughout this process.  For example, Moody’s announced just last week that not only will Congress need to raise the debt ceiling to avoid a loss of AAA credit, but the legislative body, in concert with the Administration, also must engage in significant long term deficit reduction measures.  The Speaker’s preferred course of action unquestionably fails on this second metric while the alternative Reid plan arguably clears both hurdles. 

Rep. Boehner and, more importantly, Tea Party congressman who swept into power last fall are both savvy and excellent campaigners.  I can only come to one conclusion for making such an error.  That is, they must know they are beat, but if they can portray the façade of a fight worthy of historical relevance, they can maintain their electoral base.  We can then tip our hat to their ability to compromise as we all enjoy an extension of the current bull market and open the following pages to share with our children:

And he laughed as he drove in his car up the beach, “They never will learn. No.  You can’t teach a Sneetch!” But Mcbean was quite wrong.  I’m quite happy to say that the Sneetches got really quite smart on that day, The day they decided that Sneetches are Sneetches and no kind of Sneetch is the best on the beaches.  That day, all the Sneetches forgot about stars and whether they had one, or not upon thars.”

From “The Sneetches and Other Stories” by Dr. Seuss, 1961
S&P 500 SEP E-Minis Key Technical Levels

Support:  1326.75/26.50, 1322.00, 1310.25/1308.25/08.00, 1300.50, 1291.25, 1278.00
Resistance:   1340.25, 1342.50/43.75/44.25, 1352.75, 1356.25/57.25, 1367.00, 1370.00, 1380.00


Monday July 25th, 2011

I once worked with a strategist several years ago who predicted that the S&P 500 would drop below the October, 2002 lows of 768.  Using mostly technical analysis, he meticulously explained to me how the blue chip index, sitting at approximately 1180 at the time, exhibited the tell tale signs of a collapse worse than the previous decline resulting from the deflation of the Dot Com bubble.  Fundamentally bullish, I filed away his thesis in the back of my brain under the cerebral folder categorized as “When Pigs Fly.”

When the equity market bottomed at 666 on March 6, 2009 Continue reading »


Enter Shines Room Now
Online Stock, Options and Futures Trading
Powered By Shine OmniMedia © 2011 The Economist Blog | Jeremy Klein Suffusion theme by Sayontan Sinha
This site and its operators are not affiliated with nor endorsed by The Economist Publishing Co., Cornell Paper and Box Co., The London Economist Magazine, or any other entity whose trade name or trademark incorporates the English definite article "The" and/or common word "Economist".